-------------------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

ROBERT K. HOGAN

Attorney At Law

JAVITCH, BLOCK & RATHBONE, LLP

602 Main St., Suite 500

Cincinnati, OH 45202

Telephone: (513) 744-9600

IN THE COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS,

MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

120 Market Street

Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751

Case No. 09CV 3817

Judge: R. Scott Krichbaum

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER WITH BANK ONE, N.A.

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

KATHLEEN R. RINEHART, ET AL

DEFENDANTS.

Jane Doe, Unknown Spouse if any, of Micheal E. Rinehart, whose last known place of residence is 11 Dogwood Drive, Beloit, OH 44609, will take notice that on the 7th day of October, 2009, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor by merger with Bank One, N.A., filed its Complaint in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court, alleging that Defendants have or claim to have an interest in the real estate commonly known as 334 N. 16th Street, Sebring, OH 44672, and also known as Parcel Numbers 21-003-0-395.00-0 and 21-003-0-393.00-0 of the Auditor's Records of Mahoning County, Ohio. Said parcel is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached to the Mortgage to Plaintiff filed in Book 5241, Page 575, on the 22nd day of August, 2002 in the Recorder's Office of Mahoning County, Ohio.

The Complaint further alleges that by reason of default of the account of Kathleen R. Rinehart and Edward M. Rinehart, deceased, in the payment of a promissory note according to its tenor, the conditions of a mortgage deed given to it to secure payment of the said note and conveying the premises described therein have been broken and the same has become absolute. The Complaint further prays that the Defendants named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and further that the proceeds of said sale be applied to payment of Plaintiff's claim in the proper order of its priority and for such other and further relief as is just and equitable. The Defendants named above are required to answer on or before the twenty-eighth day following the last date of publication, 4th day of February, 2010, answer day being March 4, 2010, or a judgment may be rendered as prayed for herein.

In case of your failure to answer or otherwise respond as required by the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment by default will be rendered against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint.

JAVITCH, BLOCK & RATHBONE, LLP

BY:  ROBERT K. HOGAN,

  Plaintiff's Attorney.

Jan 21,28; Feb 4, 2010   10-00034