-------------------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

GEORGE J. ANNOS

Attorney At Law

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH CO., L.P.A.

24755 Chagrin Blvd., Suite 200

Cleveland, Ohio 44122

Telephone: 1-216-360-7200

IN THE COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS,

MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

120 Market Street

Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751

Case No. 08CV 1417

FIRST PLACE BANK, FKA FFY BANK, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF YOUNGSTOWN

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

JAMES R. HIGGENS, ET AL

DEFENDANTS.

Defendants, James R. Higgens, whose last known address is 1672 Lancaster Drive, Youngstown, Ohio 44511, and John Doe and/or Jane Doe, Real Names Unknown, The Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Legatees, Administrators, Executors and Assigns of, James R. Higgins, Deceased, whose Identities and Addresses are unknown, will take notice that on the 4th day of April, 2008, First Place Bank, fka FFY Bank, Successor by Merger to First Federal Savings Bank of Youngstown, filed its Complaint in Case Number 08CV 1417, in the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County, Ohio, alleging that the defendants, James R. Higgens, and John Doe and/or Jane Doe, Real Names Unknown, the unknown Heirs, Devisees, Legatees, Administrators, Executors and Assigns of, James R. Higgins, have or claim to have an interest in the real estate described below:

Situated in the Township of Austintown, County of Mahoning and State of Ohio, and known as being Lot Number Four Hundred Nineteen (419) in Highland Park Plat No. 7 as reocrded in Volume 47 of Plats, Pages 12 and 13, Mahoning County Records.

Said lot has a frontage of Seventy-eight (78) feet on the northwesterly curved line of Lancaster Drive and extends back on its northeast line One Hundred Fifty-nine and Seventeen Hundredths (159.17) feet, and on its southwest line One Hundred Fifty and Twenty-one Hundredths (150.21) feet, having a rear line of Fifty-eight (58) feet, as appears by said plat, subject to all legal highways.

PERMANENT PARCEL NO.: 48-108-0-165.00

PROPERTY LOCATION: 1672 Lancaster Drive, Youngstown, OH 44511.

The plaintiff further alleges that by reason of default in the payment of the promissory note, according to its tenor, the conditions of a concurrent mortgage deed given to secure the payment of said note and conveying the premises described, have been broken and the same has become absolute.

The plaintiff demands that the defendants named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and the proceeds of said sale applied to the payment of plaintiff's claim in the proper order of its priority and for such other and further relief as is just and equitable.

The Defendants named above are required to answer on or before the 13th day of August, 2008.

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH CO LPA

BY:  GEORGE J. ANNOS,

  Plaintiff's Attorney.

Jun 11,18,25; Jul 2,9,16, 2008   08-01069