-------------------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

ADRIENNE S. FOSTER

Attorney At Law

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH

24755 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 200

Cleveland, Ohio 44122

Telephone: 1-216-360-7200

IN THE COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS,

MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

120 Market Street

Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751

Case No. 06CV 2354

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

NICHOLAS VICTOR CARBONE, JR., ET AL

DEFENDANTS.

Defendants, Nicholas V. Carbone, Jr., and Jane Doe, Real name unknown, the unknown spouse if any, of, Nicholas V. Carbone, Jr., whose last known address is 124 South Kimberly Avenue, Austintown, Ohio 44515, will take notice that on the 21st day of September, 2006, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, filed its Answer, Counterclaim and Crossclaim of the defendant Bank of America, NA, in Case Number 06CV 2354, in the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County, Ohio, alleging that the defendants, Nicholas V. Carbone, Jr., and Jane Doe, Real name unknown, The unknown spouse if any, of, Nicholas V. Carbone, Jr., have or claim to have an interest in the real estate described below:

Situated in the County of Mahoning, State of Ohio and in the Township of Austintown:

And known as being Lot Number Eleven (11) in a replat of Lot 2 of Walter S. May Farm Plat, replat of Lot 4 of Walter S. May Farm Plat and a replat of Lots 7 thru 18 of John Tisone Plat, as recorded in Volume 64 of Plats, Page 96, Mahoning County Records.

Said lot has a frontage of Sixty (60) feet on the west line of Kimberly Avenue and extends back on its north line One Hundred Eighty-five and Nine tenths (185.9) feet, and on its south line One Hundred Eighty-five and Nine Tenths (185.9) feet, having a rear line of Sixty (60) feet, as appears by said plat, be the same more or less but subject to all legal hihgways.

Known for street numbering purposes as 124 South Kimberly Avenue, Youngstown, OH 44515

PERMANENT PARCEL NO. 48-017-0-014.000

The Plaintiff further alleges that by reason of default in the payment of the promissory note, according to its tenor, the conditions of a concurrent mortgage deed given to secure the payment of said note and conveying the premises described, have been broken and the same has become absolute.

The Plaintiff demands that the defendants named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and the proceeds of said sale applied to the payment of Plaintiff‘s claim in the proper order of its priority and for such other and further relief as is just and equitable.

The defendants named above are required to answer on or before the 15th day of February, 2007.

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH

BY:  ADRIENNE S. FOSTER

Attorney for Plaintiff.

Dec 14,21,28, 2006; Jan 4,11,18, 2007  06-02402