-------------------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

PETER L. MEHLER

Attorney At Law

REIMER, LORBER & ARNOVITZ CO., L.P.A.

2450 Edison Blvd

P.O. Box 968

Twinsburg, Ohio 44087

Telephone: 1-330-425-4201

IN THE COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS,

MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

120 Market Street

Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751

Case No. 06CV 1639

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

AMANDA DUCKWORTH, ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS.

Trust No. 3396 Tang, *Lynn DeJulio, Trustee of Trust No. 3396 Tang, whose last place of residence is known as c/o Lynn DeJulio as Trustee, 2408 Wydesteel Avenue, Apt. 2, Youngstown, Ohio 44505, *2408 Wydesteel Avenue, Apt. 2, Youngstown, Ohio 44505, but whose present place of residence is unknown will take notice that on the 28th day of April, 2006, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., filed its Complaint and on the 11th day of May, 2006, filed its Amended Complaint in Case No. 06CV 1639 in the Court of Common Pleas, Mahoning County, Ohio, alleging that the Defendants, Trust No. 3396 Tang, have or claim to have an interest in the real estate described below:

Situated in the City of Youngstown, County of Mahoning and State of Ohio:

And known as being Youngstown City Lot Number Twenty-five Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-four (25824) according to the latest enumeration of lots in said City as shown by a plat recorded in Volume 38 of Plats, Page 22, Mahoning County Records.

Said Youngstown City Lot Number Twenty-five Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-four (25824) has a frontage of Fifty-six (56) feet on the Southwest line of Tangent Street and extends back One Hundred Twenty-five (125) feet on the North line, One Hundred Twenty-five (125) feet on the South line, and has a rear line of Fifty-six (56) feet, as appears by said Plat, be the same more or less, but subject to all legal highways.

Known for street numbering purposes as 2408 Wydesteel Avenue, Apt. 2, Youngstown, Ohio 44505

PERMANENT PARCEL NO. 53-012-0-095.00-0

The Petitioner further alleges that by reason of default of the Defendant(s) in the payment of a promissory note, according to its tenor, the conditions of a concurrent mortgage deed given to secure the payment of said note and conveying the premises described, have been broken, and the same has become absolute.

The Petitioner prays that the Defendant(s) named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and the proceeds of said sale applied to the payment of Petitioner‘s claim in the proper order of its priority, and for such other and further relief as is just and equitable. THE DEFENDANT(S) NAMED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO ANSWER ON OR BEFORE THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2006.

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

REIMER, LORBER & ARNOVITZ CO., L.P.A.

BY:  PETER L. MEHLER,

Attorney for Plaintiff-Petitioner.

Jul 27; Aug 3,10,17,24,31, 2006  06-01397