Login | April 17, 2026

COMMON PLEAS COURT
of MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

Full text of Legal Notice

-------------------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

KIM M. HAMMOND

LEONARD A. CUILLI

Attorneys At Law

KEITH D.WEINER & ASSOCIATES CO., LPA

75 Public Square, 4th Floor

Cleveland, Ohio 44113

Telephone: 1-216-771-6500

IN THE COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS,

MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

120 Market Street

Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751

Case No. 05 CV 2663

HOUSEHOLD REALTY CORPORATION

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

RICHARD E. ANDERSON, ET AL

DEFENDANTS.

The Unknown Heirs at law, legatees, devisees, next of kin of Richard E. Anderson, whose last known place of residence is unknown, and whose present place of residence is also unknown, will hereby take notice that on the 22nd day of July, 2005, Household Realty Corporation, filed a Complaint against you in the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County, Ohio, being Case Number 05 CV 2663, and on October 5, 2005, a Supplemental Complaint was filed in the Court of Common Pleas Mahoning County, Ohio, alleging that Defendants, The Unknown Heirs at law, legatees, devisees, next of kin of Richard E. Anderson has or claims to have an interest in the real estate described below:

Situated in the City of Struthers, County of Mahoning and State of Ohio:

And known as being Struthers City Lot Number Six Hundred Forty-four (644) according to the latest enumeration of lots in said City, formerly known as being Lot Number 16 in Helen S. Thomas Plat, as recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 35, Mahoning County Records.

Said Lot has a frontage of Forty (40) feet on the North line of Sexton Street and extends back on its East line One Hundred Forty-two and Two Tenths (142.2) feet, and on its West line, which is also the East line of a 15 foot unnamed alley, One Hundred Forty-two and Two Tenths (142.2) feet, having a rear line of Forty (40) feet, as appears by said Plat.

PERMANENT PARCEL NO.: 38-007-164.00

PROPERTY LOCATION: 115 Sexton Street, Struthers, Ohio 44471.

The Petitioner further alleges that by reason of default of Defendants, Richard E. Anderson and Karen M. Anderson in the payment of a promissory note, according to its tenor, the conditions of a concurrent mortgage deed given to secure the payment of said note and conveying the premises described, have been broken, and the same has become absolute.

The Petitioner prays that Defendants named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and the proceeds of said sale applied to the payment of Petitioner's claim in the proper order of its priority, and for such other further relief as is just and equitable.

Defendants named above are required to answer the Complaint within Twenty-eight (28) days from the last date of publication of this notice, which will be published for six (6) successive weeks, said answer day being the 17th day of January, 2006.

KEITH D. WEINER & ASSOCIATES CO., LPA

BY:  KIM M. HAMMOND,

LEONARD A. CUILLI

  Plaintiff's Attorneys.

Nov 15,22,29; Dec 6,13,20, 2005   05-02031

 

[Back]