Login | April 17, 2026

COMMON PLEAS COURT
of MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

Full text of Legal Notice

-------------------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

GEORGE J. ANNOS

Attorney At Law

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH

24755 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 200

Cleveland, Ohio 44122

Telephone: 1-216-360-7200

IN THE COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS,

MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

120 Market Street

Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751

Case No. 04CV 3658

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

ROBERTA THOMAS, AKA ROBERTA D. THOMAS, ET AL

DEFENDANTS.

Defendants, Roberta Thomas, aka Roberta D. Thomas and John Doe, real name unknown, the unknown spouse if any, of Roberta Thomas, aka, Roberta D. Thomas, whose last known address is 145 Roslyn Drive, Youngstown, Ohio 44505, will take notice that on the 19th day of October, 2004, Ameriquest Mortgage Company, filed their Complaint in Case Number 04CV 3658, in the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County, Ohio, alleging that the defendants, Roberta Thomas, aka, Roberta D. Thomas and John Doe, real name unknown, the unknown spouse if any, of Roberta Thomas, aka Roberta D. Thomas, have or claim to have an interest in the real estate described below:

SITUATED IN THE CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, COUNTY OF MAHONING, STATE OF OHIO, AND KNOWN AS BEING LOT NUMBER FORTY-THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE (43275) ACCORDING TO THE LATEST ENUMERATION OF LOTS IN SAID CITY, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 22 OF PLATS, PAGE 187, MAHONING COUNTY RECORDS. SAID LOT HAS A FRONTAGE OF FORTY (40) FEET ON THE SOUTH LINE OF ROSLYN DRIVE AND EXTENDS BACK ON ITS EAST LINE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY AND FORTY-FIVE HUNDREDTHS (120.45) FEET, AND ON ITS WEST LINE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY AND FORTY HUNDREDTHS (120.40) FEET, HAVING A REAR LINE OF FORTY (40) FEET, AS APPEARS BY SAID PLAT, SUBJECT TO ALL LEGAL HIGHWAYS.

Known for street numbering purposes as 145 Roslyn Drive, Youngstown, Ohio 44505

PERMANENT PARCEL NO. 53-012-388

The Plaintiff further alleges that by reason of default in the payment of the promissory note, according to its tenor, the conditions of a concurrent mortgage deed given to secure the payment of said note and conveying the premises described, have been broken and the same has become absolute.

The Plaintiff demands that the defendants named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and the proceeds of said sale applied to the payment of Plaintiff‘s claim in the proper order of its priority and for such other and further relief as is just and equitable.

The defendants named above are required to answer on or before the 24th day of August, 2005.

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH

BY:  GEORGE J. ANNOS,

Attorney for Plaintiff.

Jun 22,29; Jul 6,13,20,27, 2005  05-01012

 

[Back]