Login | April 17, 2026
COMMON PLEAS COURT
of MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO
Full text of Legal Notice
LEGAL NOTICE
JAMES C. WRENTMORE
Attorney At Law
REIMER, LORBER & ARNOVITZ CO., L.P.A.
2450 Edison Blvd
P.O. Box 968
Twinsburg, Ohio 44087
Telephone: 1-330-425-4201
IN THE COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS,
MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO
120 Market Street
Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751
Case No. 04CV 1960
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
RICHARD P. TYLER, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.
Richard P. Tyler, Elizabeth A. Tyler, whose last place of residence is known as: 398 Tudor Lane, Youngstown, Ohio 44512-1639, but whose present place of residence is unknown, will take notice that on the 10th day of June, 2004, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, filed its Complaint in Case No. 04CV 1960 in the Court of Common Pleas, Mahoning County, Ohio, alleging that the above-named Defendants, have or claim to have an interest in the real estate described below:
Situated in the Township of Boardman, County of Mahoning, State of Ohio, and known as being Lot Number One Hundred Seventy-eight (178) in New England Lanes as recorded in Volume 29 of Plats, Page 59, Mahoning County Records. Said Lot has a frontage of Sixty-nine (69) feet on the North line of Tudor Lane and extends back on its West line One Hundred Fifty (150) feet, and on its East line, which is also the West line of Canterbury Lane One Hundred Fifty (150) feet, having a rear line of Sixty-nine (69) feet, as appears by said Plat.
Known for street numbering purposes as 398 Tudor Lane, Youngstown, Ohio 44512-1639
PERMANENT PARCEL NO. 29-009-0-300.00-0
The Petitioner further alleges that by reason of default of the Defendant(s) in the payment of a promissory note, according to its tenor, the conditions of a concurrent mortgage deed given to secure the payment of said note and conveying the premises described, have been broken, and the same has become absolute.
The Petitioner prays that the Defendant(s) named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and the proceeds of said sale applied to the payment of Petitioner‘s claim in the proper order of its priority, and for such other and further relief as is just and equitable. THE DEFENDANT(S) NAMED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO ANSWER ON OR BEFORE THE 12th DAY OF JANUARY, 2005.
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
REIMER, LORBER & ARNOVITZ CO., L.P.A.
BY: JAMES C. WRENTMORE,
Attorney for Plaintiff-Petitioner.
Nov 10,17,24; Dec 1,8,15, 2004 04-01767
