Login | April 17, 2026

COMMON PLEAS COURT
of MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

Full text of Legal Notice

-------------------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

GEORGE J. ANNOS

Attorney At Law

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH, LPA

24755 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 200

Cleveland, Ohio 44122

Telephone: 1-216-360-7200

IN THE COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS,

MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO

120 Market Street

Youngstown, Ohio 44503-1751

Case No. 04CV 2108

SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF WARREN

PLAINTIFF,

VS.

WILLIE M. POWELL, ET AL

DEFENDANTS.

Defendants, JOHN DOE AND/OR JANE DOE, REAL NAMES UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, EXECUTORS AND ASSIGNS OF RONALD M. WARD, DECEASED, whose addresses are unknown, will take notice that on the 12th day of August, 2004, Second National Bank of Warren, filed their supplemental complaint in Case Number 04CV 2108, in the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County, Ohio, alleging that the defendants, JOHN DOE AND/OR JANE DOE, REAL NAMES UNKNOWN, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, EXECUTORS AND ASSIGNS OF RONALD M. WARD, DECEASED, have or claim to have an interest in the real estate described below:

Situated in the City of Campbell, County of Mahoning and the State of Ohio:

And known as being Campbell City Lots Nos. 1383, 1384 and 1385, formerly Plat Lots Nos. 179, 180 and 181, in the East Youngstown Land and Improvement Company's Plat No. 2, a Subdivision of a part of Coitsville Township Great Lots Nos. 16, 24 and 27, as shown by the recorded Plat of said Subdivision in Volume 4 of Maps, Page 26 1/2 and 26 3/4 of Mahoning County Records and together forming a parcel of land having a frontage of 150 feet on the Northerly side of Whipple Avenue and extending back of equal width 150 feet, as appears by said Plat be the same more or less.

Known for street numbering purposes as 336 Whipple, Campbell, Ohio 44405

PERMANENT PARCEL NOS. 46-009-0-111.00-0, 46-009-0-110.00-0 and 46-009-0-109.00-0.

The Plaintiff further alleges that by reason of default in the payment of the promissory note, according to its tenor, the conditions of a concurrent mortgage deed given to secure the payment of said note and conveying the premises described, have been broken and the same has become absolute.

The Plaintiff demands that the defendants named above be required to answer and set up their interest in said real estate or be forever barred from asserting the same, for foreclosure of said mortgage, the marshalling of any liens, and the sale of said real estate, and the proceeds of said sale applied to the payment of Plaintiff‘s claim in the proper order of its priority and for such other and further relief as is just and equitable.

The defendants named above are required to answer on or before the 26th day of October, 2004.

CARLISLE, McNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH

BY:  GEORGE J. ANNOS

Attorney for Plaintiff.

Aug 24,31; Sep 7,14,21,28, 2004  04-01295

 

[Back]